Table of Contents:
Share this article!
Power of Attorney in CTA Reporting: Introduction
A critical aspect of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is the requirement for certain entities to report their beneficial ownership information (BOI) to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). This reporting is vital for revealing the individuals who ultimately own or control legal entities, thereby preventing misuse of the financial system. However, the inclusion of individuals holding a Power of Attorney (POA) for a beneficial owner presents a nuanced challenge that professionals must carefully navigate. Under the CTA, the definition of a beneficial owner includes those who reach ownership interest requirements or have substantial control over significant aspects of a reporting company. 
This definition raises questions about the status of POA holders, who may have the authority to make decisions on behalf of a beneficial owner. The complexity lies in determining when a POA holder’s authority translates into “beneficial ownership” over a company, necessitating their inclusion in the BOI report (BOIR). The final regulations issued by FinCEN provide some clarity on this matter. According to the regulations: “FinCEN does not envision that the performance of ordinary, arms-length advisory or other third-party professional services to a reporting company would provide an individual with the power to direct or determine, or have substantial influence over, important decisions of a reporting company. In such a case, the senior officers or board members of a reporting company would remain primarily responsible for making the decisions based on the external input provided by such third-party service providers,” stated on page 30 of the Reporting Rule.
This statement underscores that not all POA holders or third-party service providers will meet the criteria for being reported as beneficial owners, especially if their role is limited to providing advisory services without the power to influence key decisions. Furthermore, the regulations specify an exception for tax or legal professionals designated as agents of the reporting company. According to 31 CFR 1010.380(d)(3)(ii), the exception to the ‘beneficial owner’ definition with respect to nominees, intermediaries, custodians, and agents would apply in these cases. This means that if a tax or legal professional is acting merely as an agent within the scope of providing professional services, without substantial control or ownership interest, they are not considered beneficial owners under the CTA. For professionals navigating these regulations, it’s important to analyze the nature of the POA or agency relationship with the reporting company. The key factors to consider include the extent of authority granted to the POA holder or agent and whether this authority includes the power to make significant decisions affecting the company’s operations or finances. This analysis is not straightforward and requires a deep understanding of both the legal framework surrounding POAs and the specific operational dynamics of the reporting company. Given the complexities and potential legal implications, professionals are advised to consult with legal experts when determining the necessity of reporting a POA holder or agent as a beneficial owner. Legal counsel can provide invaluable guidance on interpreting the regulations and applying them to specific cases, ensuring compliance while accurately reflecting the ownership and control structure of the reporting company.
Get in Touch
Table of Contents
