What Are Dissolved Entities’ BOI Reporting Requirements?

Posted on July 19, 2024December 9, 2024 by Vladimir

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) released new FAQs on July 8, 2024, that offer significant clarification on the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements for dissolved and terminated entities. These FAQs are essential for entities navigating the complexities of compliance with the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), particularly those that ceased to exist before or after the reporting requirements came into effect on January 1, 2024.

Dissolved Entities’ BOI Reporting Requirements: Before January 1, 2024

Companies that entirely completed the process of formally and irrevocably dissolving before January 1, 2024, are not required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN. According to FinCEN, a company ceases to exist when it has entirely completed the process of formally and irrevocably dissolving. Generally, this includes:

Filing dissolution paperwork with its jurisdiction of creation or registration,
Receiving written confirmation of dissolution,
Paying related taxes or fees,
Ceasing to conduct any business,
Winding up its affairs (e.g., fully liquidating itself and closing all bank accounts).

What to consider: Being administratively dissolved or suspended—such as failing to pay a filing fee or comply with certain jurisdictional requirements—does not mean that a company ceases to exist as a legal entity unless the dissolution or suspension becomes permanent. The requirements for reaching irrevocability can be different in each state, so it is advised to see the requirements in the jurisdiction where the entity was formed or registered to confirm.

Dissolved Entities’ BOI Reporting Requirements: Existing on or After January 1, 2024

Companies that continued to exist as legal entities for any period on or after January 1, 2024, must report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN, even if they had ceased conducting business or wound up their affairs before the reporting requirements became effective. What to consider: If an entity that was formed prior to January 1, 2024, formally and irrevocably dissolves on or after January 1, 2024, it will still be subject to reporting requirements. Just because it dissolved before its due date – January 1, 2025 – does not exclude it from filing an initial BOI Report.

Specifics for Companies Created or Registered in 2024 or Later

Companies created or registered in 2024 must report their beneficial ownership information within 90 days of receiving actual or public notice of creation or registration. For those created or registered in 2025 or later, the reporting window is reduced to 30 days. These timelines remain applicable even if the company winds up its affairs and ceases to exist before the due date of the initial BOI report.

Practical Implications for Dissolved and Terminated Entities

These FAQs provide clear guidance for companies and their advisors on how to navigate the BOI reporting landscape. They highlight the importance of understanding jurisdiction-specific dissolution processes, as administrative dissolutions or suspensions do not necessarily equate to a company ceasing to exist unless they become permanent. Entities permanently dissolved before the CTA effective date can avoid reporting obligations, while those existing beyond the threshold must ensure timely compliance to avoid penalties.

Get in Touch

Table of Contents

BOI Reporting in Other Countries

Posted on July 17, 2024December 9, 2024 by Vladimir

Share this article!
The implementation of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) in the United States has prompted discussions about the necessity and effectiveness of beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting.

While a recent court ruling has temporarily challenged the CTA’s constitutionality – for a narrow set of entities – it’s important to recognize that the U.S. is not alone in this effort. Many countries around the world have long-standing BOI reporting requirements, driven by the need to increase transparency and combat financial crimes.

This global trend suggests that, regardless of current legal battles, BOI reporting might remain a fixture in the U.S. regulatory landscape.

BOI Reporting in Other Countries: A Global Perspective

Understanding the international landscape of BOI reporting provides valuable context for why the CTA exists and its potential long-term staying power. Many countries have established BOI reporting requirements to increase transparency, prevent money laundering, and combat financial crimes.

Countries such as the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Australia, India, Switzerland, Singapore, and Hong Kong have established beneficial ownership databases.

The widespread adoption of BOI reporting regulations across the globe underscores a growing commitment to financial transparency.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has specifically called out the United States for having weak insight into its corporate structures, highlighting the need for stronger regulatory frameworks. The FATF advocates for robust measures to combat money laundering and other financial crimes, and this international pressure suggests that beneficial ownership reporting is a critical component of modern financial regulation.

The consistent international demand for transparency, coupled with the U.S.’s own legislative efforts, indicates that BOI reporting is not a transient requirement but a necessary step towards comprehensive financial oversight.

Implications for the United States

Given the global trend towards transparency and the U.S. being called out for its lack of transparency by organizations like FATF, the CTA might be here to stay. Even if the current legal challenges result in a temporary delay or modification of the CTA, the underlying impetus for transparency and accountability in business ownership remains strong.

Businesses in the U.S. should prepare for BOI reporting requirements, ultimately aligning us with international standards.

Get in Touch

Table of Contents

Should I File BOI Reports Early vs. End-of-Year?

Posted on July 3, 2024December 9, 2024 by Vladimir

Get in Touch

File BOI Reports Early vs. End-of-Year: Important Considerations

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) mandates beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting for millions of entities be filed by the end of 2024. Some entities have only 90 days from formation to file their first report.

Now the question arises for those reports not due until December 31, 2024 – do professionals wait until the end of the year to file reports for my clients or do I start to file reports now? Given the current legal challenges and operational implications, let’s take a detailed look at the pros and cons of filing now versus waiting until the end of the year.

Filing at the End of the Year

Legal Uncertainty

Many CPAs and lawyers have been advising clients to delay filing due to a pending court case challenging the CTA’s constitutionality. The ruling on March 1 applied an injunction to a narrow set of businesses, specifically members of the National Small Business Association, not to all entities that fall under the reporting requirements.

Although it’s true that the settlement of the case could affect more than just the plaintiffs, based on typical appeal schedules, a final resolution is not expected until the last months of the year. Now, for any new entities that are formed in 2024, reports need to be filed within 90 days of formation, since the obligations are still active for those entities.

Similarly, unless there is an acceleration in the appeals process, a final resolution is not expected until the end of the year. Although technically, all entities except the plaintiffs are still required to file, this legal uncertainty has led to a cautious approach for entities whose due date is December 31, 2024.

Avoiding Immediate Updates

Filing early triggers a 30-day deadline for any required updates. Delaying the initial filing means updates are not required until the first report is submitted, potentially reducing the administrative burden throughout the year.

An analysis of the entity may lead to the conclusion that it may have lots of updates that will need to be filed, others may result in the prediction that there will be very few events in the next couple of years that could require any updates.

Prioritization of Resources

For firms with multiple projects and limited resources, end-of-year filing allows prioritization of more urgent tasks.

Filing Now

Reducing Year-End Rush

Filing early can significantly reduce the end-of-year rush, ensuring that resources are not overwhelmed by a last-minute surge.

This is particularly crucial for firms managing multiple clients, where the volume of work could be substantial. Some firms practicing in this area have decided to accelerate billing rates entering into Q4, incentivizing certain clients to initiate their filings early.

The quieter months, for those with that luxury, can be utilized to thoroughly review and understand complex client structures, ensuring accurate and compliant reporting. This detailed approach is less feasible during the busy year-end period.

New Revenue Streams

Early filing positions firms as first movers, potentially capturing a larger share of the market for BOI reporting services. This can establish a new revenue stream and build long-term client relationships. Early filing can even lock in cheaper pricing for reporting software, as many providers offer incentives for early access as well.

Adequate Time for Information Gathering

Collecting personal details and other necessary information from clients can be time-consuming. Starting early ensures ample time to track down the right information and verify the accuracy, reducing the risk of errors or omissions. This is beneficial to professionals and for the business owners that will be liable for the accuracy of the reports.

So, Should I File BOI Reports Early vs. End-of-Year?

Deciding whether to file BOI reports early or wait until the end of the year involves weighing legal, operational, and strategic considerations.

Entities with simple structures or those facing resource constraints may benefit from delaying their filings, leveraging the additional preparation time and avoiding immediate update requirements.

Conversely, early filing can mitigate year-end pressures, allow thorough review of complex structures, and capitalize on cost savings and market opportunities. Each entity must assess its unique circumstances and choose the approach that best aligns with its operational capabilities and strategic goals.

I Filed My Initial BOI Report… Now What?

Posted on June 20, 2024December 9, 2024 by Vladimir

Share this article!

What Happens After the Initial BOI Report?

As a business owner, staying ahead of regulatory changes is stressed for maintaining compliance and avoiding penalties.

One significant legislative shift that demands your immediate and ongoing attention is the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). Once you have filed the initial BOI Report for your company, it’s important to realize that CTA reporting is NOT a one-time or even annual requirement.

Updates are required as often as information changes about the company or it’s beneficial owners, and it is mandatory to report these within 30 days of any change.

Companies must establish processes for managing this component of the new requirement, especially as ownership and control structures shift. Because these changes need to be reported as they occur, now is the time to develop a plan of action for timely filing and to consider the new policies and procedures that come with this responsibility.

People are not accustomed to reporting changes in their personal information to the company, such as informing them of a new Driver’s License with a different ID number or a name change after getting married.

Which Changes Require Updated Reporting?

Some other changes that will trigger the need for updated reporting include:

Modifications in Beneficial Owner Information: Changes in legal name, residential address, and ID numbers from a Drivers License or passport.

Changes about the company or it’s structure will also trigger updates, including:

Changes in Company Information: Registering a new trade or doing-business-as name or moving to a new business address.
Alterations in Beneficial Ownership: Appointment of new beneficial owners with substantial control, change in ownership structure – especially if it involves someone reaching or surpassing the 25 percent ownership interest threshold – departure or resignation of a beneficial owner, the death of a beneficial owner, or inheritance of ownership interest.

Considering these changes, the reporting will need to be done promptly. However, it involves more than just filing the report. There are a few things you need to consider to ensure your business complies with the CTA and mitigates their risk of non compliance:

Educating Beneficial Owners (BOs)

Beneficial owners must be informed about their reporting obligations and the necessity to notify the company of any changes in their information immediately, as the company only has 30 days to report this update.

To facilitate this, beneficial owners need to be made aware of the information they must keep up-to-date with the company. Managers and personnel with substantial control, senior officers, and certain BODs are the types of people at a company that should be informed about these update requirements.

It’s also important to inform HR representatives to establish processes for collecting certain information upon hire.

Establishing a regular schedule for verifying current information with beneficial owners – depending on the size and structure of your organization, is a sound strategy.

If your lawyer or CPA is responsible for maintaining compliance, they must also be notified when non-client owners have a change in information. This may involve introducing certain owners to your lawyer or CPA to ensure a clear line of communication for these updates. If not, the engaged owner must communicate with the other beneficial owners and then relay the information to the professional.

Human Resources Coordination

If you haven’t yet discussed this with your HR team or those handling employee relations at your company, now is the time to do so. The HR team needs to be thoroughly familiar with the CTA requirements, especially those related to substantial control roles.

They must ensure that new hires in positions of substantial control are informed about their reporting obligations during the onboarding process, including the collection of necessary personal information as part of their employment documentation.

Beneficial owners are not only the individuals that work at the company but also those who hold at least 25% ownership interests. For example, if your company is owned by someone and their spouse, but the spouse doesn’t work at the company, HR will need to make sure that the spouses information is acquired and maintained.

Additionally, make sure that someone on your team is monitoring any updates or changes in the regulations from FinCEN that may require adjustments to internal processes or reporting procedures.

Establishing New Policies and Procedures

Creating new standard operating procedures (SOPs) is critical for compliance. Develop clear policies outlining the process for updating required information or even updating their FinCEN IDs. Ensure these policies are easily accessible and understood by all relevant parties. Integrate these policies into your hiring and onboarding processes so new hires are immediately aware of their responsibilities.

Ask yourself these questions:

How often will you remind beneficial owners about the need to make updates? Will you need to provide them resources more than once to educate them?
Will you proactively ask beneficial owners if they had any changes in their information? Who will do this and how often?
What is the channel for the beneficial owner to inform the designated individual about any changes to their information?
Who is responsible for submitting the updated BOI Reports?
Is HR watching for changes in job descriptions or new roles that might give someone substantial control, thus requiring an updated report including that individual as a beneficial owner?

Since some updates will need to be made through the individuals’ login.gov accounts – if they have a FinCEN ID – it’s essential to ensure that beneficial owners maintain secure access to their accounts and understand how to promptly update their information. Develop policies to verify that the update was made in their account correctly and on time to ensure the company has met its responsibilities.

Responsibility for Filing Updates

Determine who will be responsible for filing updates with FinCEN. Will it be a business owner, CPA, or another designated individual? Clear delegation can prevent lapses in compliance.

A major consideration for ensuring personal information gets reported is when individuals obtain a FinCEN Identifier. When an individual gets a FinCEN ID, the company’s ability to file certain updates may be restricted.

This is because once an individual has a FinCEN ID and uses it on the BOI Report in place of their required information, they can only update their information through their login.gov account. For instance, an individual should inform the company of a change in their home address, but they will be responsible for reporting that change in their login.gov account.

If they hadn’t obtained a FinCEN ID, the change in address would be reported by the company in an updated BOI Report. Companies need to carefully consider this because BOI Reporting is their responsibility to ensure all reported information is accurate. Implementing a system to verify that beneficial owners have actually filed their information with FinCEN might involve collecting proof of submission from the individuals.

If you find yourself needing to file many updates during the year or you’re not sure how many you will need, it’s not too late to consider using a software to enhance management even reduce the amount of time it takes for ongoing CTA compliance.

Software solutions, like Secure Compliance, are designed to collect, store, and manage personal information securely. This can streamline the process, provide a channel for owners to report their updated information, and ensure that data is easily accessible when needed. Our software also ensures that personal information remains in our software, not on the company’s servers.

Reporting software can also reduce the number of times you need to reenter information.

When using the FinCEN website or some other software, you have to reenter all details of the report, even if the update is just one address of a beneficial owner.

For companies with multiple related entities or even for just one entity with continuously changing information, software can store the owners’ information so you don’t have to enter the same person on each report—enter it once and tie it to all desired entities or change the one item of information and file.

Secure Compliance subscriptions also offer unlimited updates, so you won’t have to worry about how many updates or corrections you’ll need to file throughout the year.

The CTA introduces new complexities for business owners, but with careful planning and the right tools, you can navigate these changes successfully. By establishing clear procedures, leveraging professional assistance, and utilizing technology, your business can stay compliant and avoid the potential pitfalls of this new regulatory landscape.

Get in Touch

Table of Contents

What is the CTA Effect on Bearer Stock?

Posted on June 19, 2024December 9, 2024 by Vladimir

The CTA’s Effect on Bearer Stock: An Introduction

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), enacted to promote transparency and combat illicit activities, has significant implications for various aspects of corporate governance and ownership structures.

One notable area affected by the CTA is the issuance of bearer stock, a once-common method in some states for evidencing ownership interest in a company.

The CTA explicitly prohibits the issuance of bearer shares, fundamentally altering how ownership interests can be documented and transferred.

This article explores the impact of the CTA on bearer stock and the broader implications for corporate transparency and compliance.

Understanding Bearer Stock

Bearer stock refers to shares of a company owned by whoever holds the physical stock certificates, without the need for registration or ownership records. This form of stock ownership has historically been attractive due to its anonymity and ease of transfer.

However, these same characteristics have made bearer stock a vehicle for money laundering, tax evasion, and other illicit activities, as it allows ownership to be transferred without leaving a paper trail.

The Corporate Transparency Act’s Provisions

The CTA includes a specific prohibition against the issuance of bearer shares. According to the CTA §5336(f):

“A corporation, limited liability company, or other similar entity formed under the laws of a State or Indian Tribe may not issue a certificate in bearer form evidencing either a whole or fractional interest in the entity.”

The core premise of bearer stock—anonymous ownership—is fundamentally at odds with the transparency objectives of the CTA.

By explicitly prohibiting the issuance of bearer shares, the CTA ensures that all ownership interests must be registered and traceable. Companies that previously relied on bearer stock for anonymity must now transition to registered shares, where ownership is documented and reported.

Effect on BOI Reporting Requirements

The CTA imposes a new compliance requirement on companies, including regular updates and corrections to beneficial ownership information (BOI) filings.

Bearer stock, which lacks a mechanism for tracking ownership changes, means companies with these shares must adopt more transparent ownership structures that allow for accurate and timely reporting to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Entities that continue to issue bearer stock or fail to comply with BOI reporting requirements face increased regulatory scrutiny and potential penalties. The CTA empowers authorities to enforce compliance and penalize non-compliant entities, further deterring the use of bearer stock.

Companies must ensure their ownership structures align with the CTA’s transparency goals to avoid legal and financial repercussions.

Broader Implications for Corporate Governance

The CTA effect on bearer stock is part of a broader shift towards greater transparency and accountability in corporate governance.

By eliminating anonymous ownership, the CTA fosters a business environment where illicit activities are harder to conceal. This shift benefits legitimate businesses by creating a level playing field and enhancing trust among investors, regulators, and the public.

Companies must adapt to these new requirements by transitioning to registered shares and ensuring compliance with BOI reporting obligations.

Get in Touch

CTA Exemption for a Broker or Dealer in Securities

Posted on June 13, 2024December 9, 2024 by Vladimir

CTA Exemption for a Broker or Dealer in Securities: Introduction

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) was enacted to bring transparency into the ownership structures of legal entities in the US. Its primary aim is to uncover and mitigate illicit activities such as money laundering and fraud. As there are many kinds of entities operating in the U.S. economy, providing exemptions for certain types of entities due to the nature of their activities is something to be aware of. Among the 23 identified exemptions, this article expands upon the “broker or dealer in securities” exemption.

Broker or Dealer Under the Securities Exchange Act

To understand the CTA exemption for a broker or dealer in securities, it is essential to grasp the definitions provided under section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) (15 U.S.C. 78c): Broker: A broker is defined as any person engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities for the account of others. This includes individuals or firms that facilitate the buying and selling of securities on behalf of clients, such as stockbrokers and brokerage firms. Dealer: A dealer, on the other hand, is any person engaged in the business of buying and selling securities for their own account, through a broker or otherwise. This category includes market makers and firms that trade securities for their own investment purposes.

Qualification Criteria for the Broker or Dealer in Securities Exemption

An entity can qualify for this exemption if both of the following conditions are met:

Definition Alignment: The entity must be a “broker” or “dealer,” as defined in section 3 of the SEA (15 U.S.C. 78c). This ensures that the entity is engaged in the business of trading securities either on behalf of others or for its own account.
Registration Requirement: The entity must be registered under section 15 of the SEA (15 U.S.C. 78o). This section mandates registration for brokers and dealers who conduct transactions in securities, ensuring they adhere to regulatory standards designed to protect investors and maintain market integrity.

Revisiting Exemption Status

It is important to maintain thorough records to support any claimed exemption from the CTA and to periodically revisit the exemption status. If definitions are not met and/or the entity is no longer registered under the applicable section of the SEA, the entity may be subject to CTA reporting requirements. If an initial BOI report has already been filed and later meets this exemption, a “newly exempt entity” BOI Report will need to be filed within 30 days of the status change – you cannot simply cease reporting right away. The CTA exemption for a broker or dealer in securities acknowledges the extensive regulatory oversight these entities already undergo. Registered brokers and dealers are subject to rigorous standards and scrutiny by regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). By recognizing this existing oversight, the CTA aims to avoid redundancy in reporting requirements while still fulfilling its objective of transparency and anti-fraud measures.

Get in Touch